OPUS Siegen

Eingang zum Volltext in OPUS

Hinweis zum Urheberrecht

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11809
URL: http://dokumentix.ub.uni-siegen.de/opus/volltexte/2017/1180/

Why there is no fact of reason in the Groundwork : three arguments

Schönecker, Dieter

Originalveröffentlichung: (2016) González, Ana Marta (edt.) ; Vigo, Alejandro G. (edt.): Reason and normativity ; Vol. 12. Theories of action and morality : perspectives from philosophy and social theory. Hildesheim ; Zürich ; New York : Georg Olms Verlag, 2016. - ISBN 978-3-487-15387-2, S. 55 - 77
Dokument 1.pdf (1.759 KB)

Bookmark bei Connotea Bookmark bei del.icio.us
SWD-Schlagwörter: Kant, Immanuel , Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten , Kritik der praktischen Vernunft , Vernunft , Ethik
Institut: (ohne Institutsbezeichnung)
DDC-Sachgruppe: Philosophie
GHBS-Notation: JIQR = Kant, Immanuel (1724 - 1804)
Dokumentart: Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Erstellungsjahr: 2016
Publikationsdatum: 07.08.2017
Kurzfassung auf Englisch: Endless disagreements as to whether Kant defends this or that particular claim in this or that particular text have accompanied the work of Kant interpretation from the very beginning. Would one have to be regarded as disreputable and ill-disposed to think that these disagreements simply spring from the nature of the texts themselves? I think so. For while we cannot deny that there are different opinions about the question, for example, of whether Kant is already claiming the existence of a “fact of reason” in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (GMS) before he explicidy makes this claim in the Critique of Practical Reason (KpV), it would be a genetic fallacy to conclude from this that the question is unanswerable and simply arises from the unfathomable character of the texts.
Lizenz: Veröffentlichtungsvertrag